Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?


Currently submitted to: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 29, 2019 - Sep 14, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

A comparison between traditional citation metrics and altmetrics amongst dermatology journals.

  • Gregg Murray; 
  • Rebecca Hellen; 
  • James Ralph; 
  • Siona Ni Raghallaigh; 



Research impact has traditionally been measured using citation count and impact factor. Academics have long relied heavily on this form of metric system to measure a publication’s impact. A higher number of citations is viewed as an indicator of the importance of the research, and a marker for the impact of the publishing journal. Recently, social media and online news sources have become important avenues for dissemination of research, resulting in the emergence of an alternative metric system known as altmetrics.


We assessed the correlation between altmetric attention score and traditional scientific impact markers, namely journal impact factor (IF) and article citation count for all the dermatology journal and published articles of 2017.


InCites Journal Citation Reports was utilized to identify dermatology journals with their associated impact factor in 2017 [6]. There are 64 official dermatology journals, all of which were included in this study. These journals were entered into Altmetric Explorer, a web based platform that enables users to browse and report on all attention data for every piece of scholarly content Altmetric Explorer has found attention for [5].


For the 64 dermatology journals, there was a moderate positive correlation between journal IF and journal AAS (rs = 0.513, p < 0.0001). From the 64 dermatology journals, 6,323 articles were published in 2017. Our data shows that there was a weak positive correlation between each article’s traditional citation count and AAS (rs = 0.257, p < 0.0001).


Our data also shows a weak correlation between article citation count and AAS. Temporal factors may explain this weak association - newer articles may receive increased online attention after publication while it may take longer for considered scientific citation counts to accumulate. It is also important to note, stories that are at times deemed newsworthy and then disseminated across the media and social media platforms border on sensationalism and may not be truly academic in nature with the opposite being also true.


Please cite as:

Murray G, Hellen R, Ralph J, Ni Raghallaigh S

A comparison between traditional citation metrics and altmetrics amongst dermatology journals.

JMIR Preprints. 25/07/2019:15643

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.15643


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.