Among chronic skin disorders, atopic dermatitis demonstrates the greatest negative impact on quality of life for both affected patients and their families, and is associated with anxiety, guilt, and depression . Emotional stress from uncontrolled eczema can be displaced on coworkers, students, and teachers, affecting the entire community. Thus, effective eczema management potentially has far-reaching benefits.
Eczema is commonly treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), the long-term use of which may cause dermal atrophy, striae, and hypertrichosis, among other adverse effects . Additionally, patients may experience treatment-resistant eczema. Therefore, cost-effective alternative treatments with fewer side effects may be prudent. A 2015 Cochrane review, titled “Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis,” assessed the efficacy and safety of the topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) tacrolimus and pimecrolimus in comparison to conventional treatments (20 randomized controlled trials, n=5885) [ ]. Significant drug comparison findings are summarized in . This review found convincing evidence that tacrolimus 0.1% was significantly more effective than low-potency TCS, pimecrolimus 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03% at improving physician- and patient-assessed appearance of eczema-affected skin in many settings. While results were mainly obtained using the subjective measures mentioned previously, several trials included in the review indicated that tacrolimus significantly improved objective measures such as the Eczema Area and Severity Index, quality of life, and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) when compared to certain TCS in various settings. However, lack of data on these secondary outcomes limited the completeness of evidence. Unfortunately, since the publication of this Cochrane review, only 1 randomized controlled trial analyzing the efficacy of TCIs has been published [ ]. Despite this study validating the findings of this Cochrane review, further research is warranted to investigate the true relationship between TCS and TCIs utilizing objective standardized criteria.
One notable side effect found in this review was burning and pruritus experienced in the first days of TCI treatment, which was most pronounced when comparing topical tacrolimus with TCS (risk ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.96-3.14, 5 studies, n=1883, high-quality evidence). These symptoms were mild and transient, and generally did not lead to discontinuation of treatment. There were no reported TCI-related cases of skin atrophy nor evidence of increased risk of malignancies.
Despite the minimal side-effects profile, a black box warning for topical tacrolimus remains due to concern for malignancies associated with systemic absorption, which is low when administered topically . Nevertheless, patients with rare skin diseases such as Netherton syndrome and lamellar ichthyosis should be cautioned, as systemic absorption of TCIs was noted in these patients [ ]. Reassuringly, a recent 10-year prospective longitudinal study following 7954 children with atopic dermatitis who used topical tacrolimus for ≥6 weeks reported no cases of lymphoma [ ].
The efficacy of tacrolimus was further substantiated with a recent 2020 study reporting that tacrolimus 0.1% was more likely to achieve clear or almost clear skin at 28 to 42 days versus vehicle (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.13-3.05) based on the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment . Eczema results in psychological stress to the patient, as well as to the patient’s family and community. Options with a favorable side-effects profile for treatment-resistant eczema or for patients who are intolerant to TCS are desirable [ ]. Tacrolimus is a suitable and effective alternative under these conditions. Thus, tacrolimus appears to be an effective treatment for eczema.
|Comparison||Measurementa||Result||RR||Quality of evidenceb|
|Tacrolimus 0.1% vs low-potency TCSc (follow-up: mean 3 weeks)||Physician’s assessment||Tacrolimus 0.1% superior||RR 3.09, 95% CI 2.14-4.45, 1 RCTd, n=371||Moderate|
|Tacrolimus 0.1% vs moderate-potency TCS (follow-up: 6 months)||Physician’s assessment||Tacrolimus 0.1% marginally better||RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.49, 2 RCTs, n=506||Moderate|
|Tacrolimus 0.1% vs pimecrolimus 1% (follow-up: mean 6 weeks)||Physician’s assessment||Tacrolimus 0.1% superior||RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34-2.42, 2 RCTs, n=506||Moderate|
|Tacrolimus 0.03% vs tacrolimus 0.1% (follow-up: 3-12 weeks)||Physician’s assessment||Tacrolimus 0.1% superior||RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.92, 6 RCTs, n=1640||High|
|Tacrolimus 0.1% vs moderate to high potency TCS (follow-up: mean 3 weeks)||Physician’s assessment||No difference||RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.16, 1 RCT, n=377||Low|
|Tacrolimus 0.1% vs moderate to high potency TCS (follow-up: mean 6 months)||Participant’s self-assessment||Marginal benefit favoring tacrolimus 0.1%||RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, 1 RCT, n=974||Low|
|Tacrolimus 0.03% vs mild-potency TCS (follow-up: mean 3 weeks)||Physician’s assessment||Tacrolimus 0.03% superior||RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.96-3.38, 2 RCTs, n=790||Moderate|
aPhysicians and participants rate skin improvement in a subjective manner. Though subjective, these tools are commonly used to assess treatment efficacy. For example, skin improvement is evaluated as excellent improvement (>90% improvement), marked improvement (75%-89%), or moderate improvement (50%-74%) from the participant’s or physician’s viewpoint .
bHigh quality: further research is very unlikely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; very low quality: very uncertain about the estimate.
cTCS: topical corticosteroids.
dRCT: randomized controlled trial.
TS receives fellowship funding from the Pfizer Global Medical Grant (58858477) Dermatology Fellowship 2020.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and in no way represent the Cochrane Library or Wiley.
This article is based on a Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7, DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd009864.pub2 (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.
Conflicts of Interest
TS serves as a section editor for JMIR Dermatology. TS also received fees for serving as a medical advisor for Antedotum Inc. JA and AH serve as social media editors for Cochrane Skin. MS is a member of the Cochrane Collaboration.
- Na CH, Chung J, Simpson EL. Quality of Life and Disease Impact of Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis on Children and Their Families. Children (Basel) 2019 Dec 02;6(12) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cury Martins J, Martins C, Aoki V, Gois AFT, Ishii HA, da Silva EMK. Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 Jul 01(7):CD009864 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Perälä M, Ahola M, Mikkola T, Pelkonen AS, Remitz A, Mäkelä MJ. Young children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis can be treated safely and effectively with either topical tacrolimus or mild corticosteroids. Acta Paediatr 2020 Mar;109(3):550-556. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lam M, Zhu JW, Tadrous M, Drucker AM. Association Between Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Use and Risk of Cancer, Including Lymphoma, Keratinocyte Carcinoma, and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021 May 01;157(5):549-558. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Paller AS, Fölster-Holst R, Chen SC, Diepgen TL, Elmets C, Margolis DJ, et al. No evidence of increased cancer incidence in children using topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020 Aug;83(2):375-381 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fahrbach K, Tarpey J, Washington EB, Hughes R, Thom H, Neary MP, et al. Crisaborole Ointment, 2%, for Treatment of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020 Aug;10(4):681-694 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
|SCORAD: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis|
|TCI: topical calcineurin inhibitor|
|TCS: topical corticosteroids|
Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 06.07.21; peer-reviewed by J Solomon, R Alhusayen; comments to author 21.07.21; revised version received 04.08.21; accepted 07.10.21; published 28.10.21Copyright
©Austin Hamp, Jarett D Anderson, Torunn E Sivesind, Mindy D Szeto, Jade Cury-Martins. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 28.10.2021.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.