Published on in Vol 6 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/45329, first published .
The Importance of Gender-Neutral Terminology in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs: A Call to Action

The Importance of Gender-Neutral Terminology in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs: A Call to Action

The Importance of Gender-Neutral Terminology in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs: A Call to Action

Viewpoint

1Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, FL, United States

2Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States

3University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States

4US Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States

Corresponding Author:

Robert Dellavalle, MD, PhD

University of Colorado School of Medicine

1700 N Wheeling St

Rm E1-342

Aurora, CO, 80045

United States

Phone: 1 720 857 5562

Fax:1 720 723 7877

Email: Robert.dellavalle@cuanschutz.edu


The use of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs is frequently required for prescriptions with potentially teratogenic effects, especially in the field of dermatology. Among these REMS programs, the most well-known example is isotretinoin, an oral retinoid that uses the iPLEDGE system. iPLEDGE has strict regulations and a lengthy approval process, and until recently, patients were grouped into 3 categories: male, female, or female of reproductive potential. This strict grouping has posed problems in the medical community, especially for gender-diverse individuals where their perceived gender conflates with their assigned grouping causing patient-specific distress. The distinction between gender—a multifactorial perception of identity—and biological sex is addressed under new iPLEDGE guidelines. Dermatologists now register patients under one of 2 categories: patients who can become pregnant and those who cannot become pregnant. This change simultaneously improves the accessibility to isotretinoin among gender-diverse individuals, while limiting prescription barriers. Despite initial success being limited due to lengthy system conversions, a registration process based on reproductive potential ultimately enhances iPLEDGE’s goal to prevent potential birth defects. We propose that other REMS programs follow the standard set by the iPLEDGE system, including those for the medications thalidomide, acitretin, and mycophenolate mofetil, all of which currently have a similar taxonomy to that of the old iPLEDGE system. Implementing the standardization of gender-neutral terminology can maximize enrollment and minimize distress. Current and ongoing refinement of iPLEDGE and other REMS is needed to build protocols solely around the prevention of birth defects without regard to sex or gender.

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e45329

doi:10.2196/45329

Keywords



Risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs in dermatology should clarify how they define gender and biological sex to appropriately focus on patients’ reproductive potential and risk for birth defects (Table 1). Specifically, REMS programs should adopt proper gender-neutral terminology. While several teratogenic prescriptions are monitored by REMS programs, isotretinoin, an oral retinoid used for acne treatment is likely the most well-known. Regulated by iPLEDGE, isotretinoin prescription originally required patients to register under one of 3 categories: male, female, or female of reproductive potential [1]. This classification system posed problems as providers were required to categorize patients of gender-diverse backgrounds into limited categories. For example, transgender males with intact uteruses and ovaries might have been categorized as females of reproductive potential. In some cases, patients have forgone treatment because improper categorization conflicted with their gender identity [2].

Medical care providers may conflate gender and biological sex. Growing awareness and inadequate terminology for transgender patients have led to changes. In December 2021, the Food and Drug Administration streamlined the iPLEDGE process and introduced gender-neutral terminology, allowing for the separation of a patient’s biological sex from their gender identity (Figure 1). Dermatologists now register patients under one of 2 categories: patients who can become pregnant and those who cannot become pregnant [3,4]. This change may improve access to isotretinoin for transgender candidates such as transmasculine patients with an increased predisposition for acne secondary to exogenous testosterone therapy [5]. A registration process based on reproductive potential ultimately enhances iPLEDGE’s goal to prevent potential birth defects.

Table 1. Definitions of key terms.
KeywordDefinition
GenderSocially constructed characteristics of women, men, girls, and boys, which define their identity
SexA set of biological attributes in humans and animals
Gender incongruenceGender identity that is different from a person’s biological sex
Gender-diverseGender identity that demonstrates a diversity of expression beyond the binary framework
TransgenderDenoting or relating to a person whose gender identity does not correspond with the sex registered to them at birth
TransmasculineA person who was registered as female at birth but whose gender identity is characterized or aligned with masculinity
Transfeminine A person who was registered as male at birth but whose gender identity is characterized or aligned with femininity
Female of reproductive potentialA person who is capable of giving birth to offspring
Figure 1. Flowchart breaking down the differences between gender and identity.

Though recent changes to iPLEDGE do not resolve population-specific concerns faced by gender-diverse individuals, it is nonetheless a pivotal step in transgender patient care—an additional step that other REMS programs have yet to adopt. Prescription medications including thalidomide, acitretin, and mycophenolate mofetil still use a similar taxonomy to the old iPLEDGE system, with patient groupings of male, female, or female of reproductive potential [6,7]. Nevertheless, overall prescription prevalence and increasing associations of skin disease with exogenous hormone therapy indicate a potential area for the use of updated REMS terminology [8]. Future standardization of gender-neutral terminology can maximize patient enrollment, minimize distress, and prevent teratogen exposure. The revision of iPLEDGE categories with gender-neutral terminology reveals continued inadequacies; ongoing effort is needed to build REMS protocols solely around the prevention of birth defects, without regard to sex or gender.

Conflicts of Interest

RD is the editor-in-chief of JMIR Dermatology but had no role in the selection of this paper for publication. TES is an editorial board member-at-large of JMIR Dermatology but did not participate in the review or editorial oversight of this paper. DS is a social media editor for JMIR Dermatology.

  1. Singer S, Keuroghlian AS. A call for gender identity data collection in iPLEDGE and increasing the number of isotretinoin prescribers among transgender health providers. LGBT Health. Jul 01, 2020;7(5):216-219. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Boos MD, Ginsberg BA, Peebles JK. Prescribing isotretinoin for transgender youth: a pledge for more inclusive care. Pediatr Dermatol. Jan 2019;36(1):169-171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Safer J. FDA OKs Gender-Neutral Language for Isotretinoin iPLEDGE Risk Management Program. Mount Sinai. 2021. URL: https://tinyurl.com/4rzmsx3b [accessed 2023-06-15]
  4. What is the iPLEDGE® REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy)? iPLEDGE. URL: https://ipledgeprogram.com/#Main [accessed 2022-12-09]
  5. Lee G, Ferri-Huerta R, Greenberg KB, Somers KE. Acne fulminans in a transgender boy after an increase in testosterone dosage. JAAD Case Rep. Mar 2022;21:32-34. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Katz KA. Transgender patients, isotretinoin, and US Food and Drug Administration-mandated risk evaluation and mitigation strategies: a prescription for inclusion. JAMA Dermatol. May 01, 2016;152(5):513-514. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Simin MK, Nagesh M. Pregnancy prevention programs for medications used in dermatology. JSSTD. Apr 17, 2020;2:18-25. [CrossRef]
  8. Braun H, Thompson EC, Zhang Q, Tangpricha V, Goodman M, Yeung H. Prevalence of psoriasis and perceived association with hormone therapy in transgender adults. Transgender Health. Mar 28, 2022 [CrossRef]


REMS: risk evaluation and mitigation strategy


Edited by J Lipoff; submitted 28.12.22; peer-reviewed by N Marroquin, S Feldman MD PhD; comments to author 16.02.23; revised version received 07.05.23; accepted 06.06.23; published 22.06.23.

Copyright

©Colin Burnette, William Smithy, Daniel Strock, Torunn E Sivesind, Robert Dellavalle. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 22.06.2023.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.