This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews in Dermatology (40) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1911) Teledermatology (66) Clinical Communication, Electronic Consultation and Telehealth (693)

Published on in Vol 6 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/46121, first published .
Consensus Guidelines for Teledermatology: Scoping Review

Consensus Guidelines for Teledermatology: Scoping Review

Consensus Guidelines for Teledermatology: Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Mollie R Cummins1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Triton Ong3 Author Orcid Image ;   Julia Ivanova3 Author Orcid Image ;   Janelle F Barrera3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Hattie Wilczewski3 Author Orcid Image ;   Hiral Soni3 Author Orcid Image ;   Brandon M Welch3, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Brian E Bunnell3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Hindelang M, Tizek L, Harders C, Sommer‐Eska L. Hybrid care potential of teledermatology: The importance of linking digital and physical practice and acceptance of online services: A cross‐sectional study. Health Science Reports 2024;7(7) View
  2. van Sinderen F, Langermans A, Kushniruk A, Borycki E, Jaspers M, Peute L. Challenges in Teledermoscopy Diagnostic Outcome Studies: Scoping Review of Heterogeneous Study Characteristics. JMIR Dermatology 2024;7:e60346 View
  3. Walter S, Koutsis J, Gorji M, Kherlopian A, Wong T, Lo S, Chiew A, Martin L. Quality and usability of photographs of skin conditions taken in emergency departments for dermatology consultation. Emergency Medicine Australasia 2025;37(1) View