Published on in Vol 6 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Derm-ographics: The Australian Dermatologist and Social Media

Derm-ographics: The Australian Dermatologist and Social Media

Derm-ographics: The Australian Dermatologist and Social Media

Authors of this article:

Antonia C Rowson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Saskia J Rowson2 Author Orcid Image

Research Letter

1The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

2Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia

Corresponding Author:

Antonia C Rowson, MBBS, BMedSc

The Alfred Hospital

55 Commercial Rd

Melbourne, 3004


Phone: 61 39 076 2000


Social media has become ubiquitous in modern life. Of 4.76 billion internet users worldwide, half use social media for 2.5 hours each day [1]. The ever-expanding use of these sites poses a relatively new consideration for doctors, especially in private practice. Evidence suggests patients have begun to rely on social media when choosing a clinician [2,3]. As a relatively visual specialty, dermatology lends itself well to social media. In this paper, we aimed to characterize the extent of online uptake by contemporary Australian dermatologists and to inform clinicians of their colleagues’ practices in regards to this emerging marketing and educational platform.

We searched the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) register of practitioners for those listed on the Australian College of Dermatology (ACD) “Find a Dermatologist” service on August 1, 2022. Of the 411 ACD-listed dermatologists, 8 were no longer AHPRA registered, 6 were practicing outside of Australia, and 6 worked exclusively in the public health system; these 20 were excluded. Duration of practice, location of practice, and sex were taken from AHPRA data (Multimedia Appendix 1). Location of practice was then assigned as either metropolitan or rural in accordance with the Australian Government’s Modified Monash Model.

A Google search was done for each dermatologist identified, using their full professional name and the term “dermatologist.” Professional websites were used to identify practice size. Further searches of the following social media platforms were then performed: Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, ResearchGate, LinkedIn, and TikTok. Only publicly accessible, professional accounts were included in our analysis.

Professional social media use was not prevalent among the 391 Australia-based private dermatologists identified (Table 1). The most commonly subscribed platform for professional use was LinkedIn. Of the dermatologists analyzed, 212 (54.2%) did not have LinkedIn, 168 (43%) had an individual LinkedIn, 2 (0.5%) had a practice LinkedIn, and 9 (2.3%) had both an individual and practice LinkedIn. The next most commonly used platform was Facebook. In decreasing frequency of use followed ResearchGate, Instagram, X, YouTube, and TikTok, respectively. Only 1 (0.3%) Australian dermatologist had an individual TikTok.

Table 1. Proportion of Australian dermatologists with professional social media accounts (N=391).

LinkedIn, n (%)Facebook, n (%)ResearchGate, n (%)Instagram, n (%)X, n (%)YouTube, n (%)TikTok, n (%)
No account212 (54.2)288 (73.7)299 (76.5)329 (84.1)368 (94.1)373 (95.4)390 (99.7)
Individual168 (43)22 (5.6)92 (23.5)21 (5.4)11 (2.8)10 (2.6)1 (0.3)
Practice2 (0.5)74 (18.9)0 (0)32 (8.2)8 (2)8 (2)0 (0)
Both9 (2.3)7 (1.8)0 (0)9 (2.3)4 (1)0 (0)0 (0)

There were no significant differences in the average number of accounts by location of practice (P=.89) or sex (P=.34). While the mean number of social media accounts decreased with duration of practice, this trend did not reach statistical significance (P=.18) (Figure 1). Group practitioners, however, were more likely than sole practitioners to hold professional social media accounts (P=.003); group practitioners held on average 1.34 accounts versus 0.89 for those practicing alone.

Figure 1. Average number of social media accounts by years in practice.

Studies are mixed regarding the importance of social media to patients in selecting a dermatologist [2,3]; younger, less-educated patients, and those seeking cosmetic interventions are likely to rely more heavily on information available online [2]. Of surveyed American patients, 32% have used social media to make health care decisions [4]. The quality of such information remains a concern; as little as 5% of dermatologic content on Instagram is posted by qualified dermatologists [5,6]. Similarly, only 27% of keratosis pilaris content on TikTok is created by dermatologists [7]. There is evidence that most Saudi and American dermatologists plan to increase their social media presence [3,8]. We found that Australian dermatologists, regardless of most demographic influences, have a limited online presence, with an average 1.21 accounts per individual, and with no social media platform attracting more than half the overall group.

American dermatologists rate Instagram as their most “valuable” platform, followed by Facebook [8]. We conversely found that LinkedIn was the most subscribed platform among our cohort, followed by Facebook. Given the nature of these sites, this implies a greater Australian uptake of social media for professional networking among medical colleagues, rather than for patient-oriented promotional or educational endeavors.

In summary, social media is an underused avenue among Australian dermatologists, with international data suggesting the public is increasingly informed in their medical decision-making by online content, including practitioner selection. A majority of Australian dermatologists do not use social media for professional purposes, although the most prevalent platform, LinkedIn, is used by 1 in 2 dermatologists. LinkedIn and ResearchGate are typically used by individuals, presumably for academic promotional purposes, and Facebook and Instagram by practices, presumably for client engagement. This fact may inform readers’ uptake according to their intentions around the type of publicity.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Demographic details of included Australian dermatologists.

DOCX File , 17 KB

  1. Chaffey D. Global social media statistics research summary 2023. Smart Insights. Jun 07, 2023. URL: https:/​/www.​​social-media-marketing/​social-media-strategy/​new-global-social-media-research/​ [accessed 2023-02-04]
  2. Murphy EC, Nelson K, Friedman AJ. The influence of dermatologists’ use of social media on attracting patients. J Drugs Dermatol. May 01, 2020;19(5):532-538. [Medline]
  3. Alhayaza G, Chisti M, Binamer Y. The impact of social media on dermatologists and in captivating their patients: a cross-sectional study. J Dermatolog Treat. Jun 21, 2022;33(4):2217-2224. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Is social media changing the doctor-patient relationship? American Academy of Family Physicians. Jun 08, 2018. URL: [accessed 2023-02-04]
  5. Ranpariya V, Chu B, Fathy R, Lipoff JB. Dermatology without dermatologists? Analyzing Instagram influencers with dermatology-related hashtags. J Am Acad Dermatol. Dec 2020;83(6):1840-1842. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Park JH, Christman MP, Linos E, Rieder EA. Dermatology on Instagram: an analysis of hashtags. J Drugs Dermatol. Apr 01, 2018;17(4):482-484. [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  7. Mansour MR, Abushukur Y, Potts GA. Keratosis pilaris on TikTok: a cross-sectional analysis of trending content. JAAD Int. Sep 2022;8:116-117. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Bressler M, Grudnikoff E, Bressler Y, Tamez R, Zampella J. Risks and benefits of using social media in dermatology: cross-sectional questionnaire study. JMIR Dermatol. Feb 24, 2021;4(1):e24737. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

ACD: Australian College of Dermatology
AHPRA: Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency

Edited by R Dellavalle; submitted 13.05.23; peer-reviewed by K Amon, M Barbosa; comments to author 08.08.23; revised version received 01.10.23; accepted 21.11.23; published 05.12.23.


©Antonia C Rowson, Saskia J Rowson. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (, 05.12.2023.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.