Abstract
We found that third-party apps such as Figure 1 were used predominantly by nondermatologist medical personnel for collaboration in medical decision-making related to dermatologic conditions conducted with other health care providers. This finding calls attention to the need for more readily available resources for nondermatologist health care providers encountering patients with skin-related conditions, with the added benefits of trained dermatologists being allies on such medical app platforms, and the platform allowing for recognition of instances when additional consultation or referral to trained dermatologists for more complex cases is appropriate.
JMIR Dermatol 2024;7:e60500doi:10.2196/60500
Keywords
Introduction
Figure 1 is a mobile app in which thousands of health professionals share and discuss medical cases in real time. Figure 1 provides a platform for medical education and collaboration and is available in close to 100 countries. The app works in a similar way to Facebook or Instagram; images are posted with captions consisting of relevant patient information, and other users offer diagnostic and treatment advice by posting in the comments section. Social media is a ubiquitous part of modern life, and the use of apps like Figure 1 to obtain medical knowledge and insight has become very popular [
]. Based on a study conducted by Ranpariya et al [ ], only 4% of dermatologic content on social media is produced by board-certified dermatologists. Therefore, the purpose of this letter is to analyze content within the Figure 1 app in regard to diagnostic agreement with nondermatologic health care professionals and discuss the advantageous role dermatologists can play in the use of the app in daily medicine.Methods
Recruitment
We collected and examined 300 dermatologic cases posted on the main feed of the Figure 1 app between June 2023 and August 2023 using Microsoft Excel. The data were organized and totals were calculated for the specialties of the authors and their reasons for posting. This research project did not involve human subjects as defined by US federal regulations under 45 CFR 46.102(f). The study used publicly available data from social media platforms that did not include any personally identifiable information or private data that would require informed consent or institutional review board approval.
Statistical Analysis
Aggregate data for both health care provider training and role (ie, physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or registered nurse) and specialty training were cumulatively added and represented as percentages of the total 300 dermatologic cases.
Results
Of the 300 cases analyzed, 151 were presented by nondermatologic physicians, 8 were presented by dermatologists, and the remaining 141 were presented by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses, with no specialty indicated. The specialties most represented among the 151 cases presented by nondermatologic physicians were internal medicine (n=65, 43%), family medicine (n=53, 35%), and emergency medicine (n=33, 22%). All cases were seeking assistance in rash or lesion identification and for future treatment.
Discussion
Principal Findings
Of the 300 cases assessed, 292 were presented by nondermatologic health care professionals seeking further assistance in rash and lesion identification. The data we gathered from this app prompted us to consider if primary care physicians (PCPs) and nondermatologic health professionals are receiving adequate education regarding appropriate treatment and criteria for common cutaneous ailments for referral.
Comparison With Prior Work
In a study conducted by Patro et al [
], the overall agreement between diagnoses made by a PCP and a dermatologist was 56%, with poor diagnostic agreement seen most in psoriasis and eczema. If dermatologists and nondermatologic health professionals can only agree 56% of the time, and only 8 of the 300 cases (2.7%) were posted by a dermatologist, as seen in Figure 1, then there is a concern related to inaccuracies and the spread of misinformation.Limitations
Reporting errors among Figure 1 app users should be considered when stating the health care provider role and case presentation. The strengths of this study could be further developed by increasing the sample size and lengthening the time of data collection, and these should be considered in future research.
Conclusion
PCPs are usually a patient’s first contact regarding their health. Thus, PCPs have a unique opportunity to recognize and treat common dermatological diseases, including benign skin lesions, fungal infections, acne, and atopic dermatitis. Knowledge and skills training should be equipped to prepare PCPs for management of certain conditions, such as skin cancer, due to their impact. Additionally, it is important for users to be aware that virtual consultations such as these should not take the place of a formal evaluation by a board-certified dermatologist. However, the larger number of cases that were presented by health care professionals without formal dermatologic training reveals a gap that can be filled by trained dermatologists. Dermatologists can use Figure 1 to aid trained professionals who are not dermatologists by providing knowledge, bridging diagnostic gaps regarding common cutaneous conditions, and preventing the spread of misinformation and misdiagnoses pertaining to the skin.
Disclaimer
This research was supported (in whole or in part) by Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare–affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
References
- Wong XL, Liu RC, Sebaratnam DF. Evolving role of Instagram in #medicine. Int Med J. Oct 2019;49(10):1329-1332. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ranpariya V, Chu B, Fathy R, Lipoff JB. Dermatology without dermatologists? Analyzing Instagram influencers with dermatology-related hashtags. J Am Acad Dermatol. Dec 2020;83(6):1840-1842. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Patro BK, Tripathy JP, De D, Sinha S, Singh A, Kanwar AJ. Diagnostic agreement between a primary care physician and a teledermatologist for common dermatological conditions in North India. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6(1):21-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
Abbreviations
PCP: primary care physician |
Edited by Robert Dellavalle; submitted 13.05.24; peer-reviewed by Dinesh Devaraj, Kathrin Giehl; final revised version received 17.09.24; accepted 20.09.24; published 13.11.24.
Copyright© Alexis Coican, Nathaniel A Marroquin, Alexa Carboni, Sara Holt, Morgan Zueger. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 13.11.2024.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.