Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30737, first published .
Novel Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus: Systematic Review

Novel Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus: Systematic Review

Novel Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus: Systematic Review

Research Letter

1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

2Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author:

Adrian Joseph Michel Bailey, BSc

Faculty of Medicine

University of Ottawa

501 Smyth Road

Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M2

Canada

Phone: 1 613 858 5029

Email: adbailey@ohri.ca



Chronic pruritus is a common and debilitating symptom associated with many dermatologic conditions and substantially impairs patients’ quality of life (QOL). In fact, the impact of chronic pruritis is thought to be comparable to that of chronic pain. Unfortunately, effective management for chronic pruritus remains limited and primarily consists of nonspecific measures, such as antihistamines and moisturizers.

There has been emerging evidence from various clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of a highly selective kappa-agonist, nalfurafine hydrochloride (TRK-820), for the treatment of pruritus in patients with chronic liver disease. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy of this agent in liver disease–associated pruritus.

PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to February 9, 2022, using the keywords “nalfurafine hydrochloride,” “itch,” and “pruritus” without restrictions. Two independent reviewers (authors AB and HOYL) screened and extracted data from all articles, with the supervising author (MK) providing consensus. All full-text single-arm, case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials with >10 patients describing the use of nalfurafine hydrochloride for the treatment of liver disease–associated pruritus were included. Editorials, commentaries, guidelines, and reviews were excluded. Outcomes included itch scores, QOL scores, and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the National Institutes of Health Pre-Post Study Quality Assessment Tool were applied to assess study quality (Multimedia Appendix 1).

Of 233 unique records, 5 studies were included (Figure 1). Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All studies were of low risk of bias or good quality.

Figure 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the study selection process.
View this figure
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
Study nameCountryStudy type (data range)Type of liver diseaseTotal participants, N (% female)Age (years), meanTreatmentOutcomesaStudy quality
Yagi et al, 2018 [1]JapanSingle arm (2015-2016)
  • PBCb with refractory pruritus
44 (89)66.8 (SD 12.3)2.5 mcg nalfurafine once daily for 12 weeks
  • VASc: 42.9 at baseline to 29.3 at the end point (P=.001)
  • PBC-40: 8.56 at baseline to 7.63 at the end point (P=.04)d
  • SF-36e: 42.9 at baseline to 29.3 at the end point (P=.001)d
Good
Akuta et al, 2018 [2]JapanSingle arm (2015-2017)
  • Positive for HBsAgf (n=19)
  • Positive for HCVg antibody (n=70)
  • HCCh (n=44)
  • Others (n=5)
138 (53)66 (range 24-91)2.5 mcg nalfurafine once daily for a median of 6.4 (range 1-38) weeks
  • 93 of 138 (67.4%) patients experienced a clinically relevant decrease in itch severity at the end point compared to baseline, predefined as a >50 mm decrease in their VAS score.
  • This did not vary according to the etiology of liver disease (HBsAg+, HCV+, or HCC; P=.16).
Good
Yoshikawa et al, 2021 [3]JapanSingle arm (2017-2018)
  • HCV (n=12)
  • AFLDi (n=5)
  • NAFLDj (n=1)
  • PBC (n=5)
  • Other (n=1) with refractory pruritus
24 (50)68 (range 18-87)2.5 mcg nalfurafine once daily for 12 weeks
  • 17 of 24 (71%) patients experienced a clinically relevant decrease in itch severity at the end point compared to baseline, predefined as a >30 mm decrease in their VAS score.
  • VAS: 50 at baseline to 25 at the end point (P=.001)
Good
Kumada et al, 2017 [4]JapanRandomized double-blind trial (2010-2012)
  • Chronic hepatitis (n=78)
  • Cirrhosis (n=142)
  • PBC (n=87)
  • Others (n=28) with refractory pruritus
317 (57)66.5 (SD 10.6)2.5 mcg or 5 mcg nalfurafine once daily for 4 weeks
  • Decrease in VAS: 28.56 and 27.46 mm in the 2.5 μg and 5 μg groups at the end point from baseline, respectively, compared to 19.25 mm in the placebo group (P=.002 and P=.006, respectively)
Low risk of bias
Kamimura et al, 2018 [5]JapanSingle arm (2015-2017)
  • PBC (n=11)
  • AFLD (n=2)
  • HCV (n=2)
  • Vanishing bile duct syndrome (n=2)
  • AIHk (n=1)
11 (78)69 (range 45-82)2.5 mcg nalfurafine once daily for >20 weeks
  • The reduction in pruritus scores was correlated with the time of administration (Pearson correlation coefficient
    r2=0.636; P=.001).
Good

aUnless otherwise indicated comparisons between baseline and the end point across studies were determined using a paired Student t test for continuous and normally distributed variables and the Mann Whitney U test for variables without normal distribution.

bPBC: primary biliary cholangitis.

cVAS: visual analog scale.

dBoth the SF-36 and PBC-40 are validated tools that assess the symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with PBC.

eSF-36: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

fHBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen.

gHCV: hepatitis C virus.

hHCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.

iAFLD: alcoholic fatty liver disease.

jNAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

kAIH: autoimmune hepatitis.

In a double-blind randomized controlled trial [4], patients with chronic liver disease and refractory pruritus experienced significant reductions in itch severity compared to a placebo capsule at 12 weeks, with a decrease in the visual analog scale of 41.6 and 39.3 mm in the 2.5 μg and 5 μg groups, respectively, compared to 32 mm in the placebo group (P=.007 and P=.03, respectively). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was higher in the experimental groups than in the placebo group. Patients reported these reactions were mild and did not impact patients’ daily activities. Major adverse drug reactions included polyuria, somnolence, insomnia, and constipation, all of which had a prevalence of 8% or lower at both doses and had a similar incidence in the placebo group.

Accounting for a combined 217 patients, 4 single-arm studies found that nalfurafine hydrochloride provided a clinically relevant decrease in itch severity in 67% to 71% of patients [2,3] and significantly improved patient QOL compared to baseline (PBC-40 decreased from 8.56 to 7.63, P=.04, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey decreased from 42.9 to 29.3, P=.001) [1], with no signs of dependence or abuse. The reduction in pruritus scores was also correlated with time of administration (r2=0.636; P=.001) [5].

In conclusion, nalfurafine hydrochloride has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of liver disease–associated pruritis, significantly reducing itch scores compared to the placebo and improving patient QOL. Its advantage over nonspecific measures is its efficacy in refractory pruritus and favorable side effect profile. Considering this agent’s efficacy and tolerability, and the detrimental effect of refractory pruritus on patient well-being, dermatologists and other physicians should strongly consider this agent for future investigation and eventual use in chronic liver disease–associated pruritus.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Supplementary material.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 315 KB

  1. Yagi M, Tanaka A, Namisaki T, Takahashi A, Abe M, Honda A, Japan PBC Study Group (JPBCSG). Is patient-reported outcome improved by nalfurafine hydrochloride in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and refractory pruritus? A post-marketing, single-arm, prospective study. J Gastroenterol 2018 Oct;53(10):1151-1158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Akuta N, Kumada H, Fujiyama S, Kawamura Y, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, et al. Predictors of pruritus in patients with chronic liver disease and usefulness of nalfurafine hydrochloride. Hepatol Res 2018 Jan;48(1):45-50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Yoshikawa S, Asano T, Morino M, Matsumoto K, Kashima H, Koito Y, et al. Pruritus is common in patients with chronic liver disease and is improved by nalfurafine hydrochloride. Sci Rep 2021 Feb 04;11(1):3015. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Kumada H, Miyakawa H, Muramatsu T, Ando N, Oh T, Takamori K, et al. Efficacy of nalfurafine hydrochloride in patients with chronic liver disease with refractory pruritus: a randomized, double-blind trial. Hepatol Res 2017 Sep;47(10):972-982. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Kamimura K, Yokoo T, Kamimura H, Sakamaki A, Abe S, Tsuchiya A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of nalfurafine hydrochloride on pruritus in chronic liver disease patients: patient-reported outcome based analyses. PLoS One 2017;12(6):e0178991 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


QOL: quality of life


Edited by R Dellavalle, T Sivesind; submitted 27.05.21; peer-reviewed by K Ashack, M Salimi; comments to author 21.07.21; revised version received 23.03.22; accepted 28.03.22; published 02.05.22

Copyright

©Adrian Joseph Michel Bailey, Heidi Oi-Yee Li, Mark G Kirchhof. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 02.05.2022.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.